The atheists' case for survival

To The Editor of The Freethinker

I can't stress strongly enough that it's only the scientific proof of survival after death that the religionists and their pseudo-scientific allies are censoring - repeatable experiments backed up with a mathematical theory.

Evidence of survival is always allowed through by the bucket full because it's completely harmless to the old-boy network. It confuses the masses. We have had evidence for thousands of years.

If you really want to bring the whole grisly religious shooting-match crashing down like a pack of cards, then all you have to do is just point to the atheists' case for a separate mind and brain. Public opinion will do the job for you, one of the most powerful forces on this planet - look at the Berlin Wall.

This can only be done outside of academia for obvious reasons. Far too many powerful fat cats with too much to lose from the truth. Good people are prevented from telling the truth while being paid by those at the top fighting for their very existence as credible intellectuals - experts.

Michael Roll

The Scientific Proof of Life After Death - Pamphlet by Michael Roll

Professional Wreckers - Two E-mails from Michael Roll to Norman Pridmore of The Freethinker (September 4, 2002)

The Freethinker - The monthly secular magazine for those who have escaped from the clutches of priestcraft - as well as those wanting to ditch religion. The Freethinker Website offers a selection of articles and information about the National Secular Society.