The Campaign for Philosophical Freedom
 News  Articles  Correspondence   Recommended  Links  About  Search 
    

E-mail from Michael Roll to an Inquirer, February 6, 2002

cfpf.org.uk

Psychics challenge one year old!!!!

Dr. H,

I have lectured at London University with Dr. Susan Blackmore and been on TV with her. Susan jumped down my throat when I made the mistake of calling her a "parapsychologist". She insists on being referred to as a psychologist and quite rightly. Psyche is the Greek for soul.

We are both based in Bristol. Not long ago she telephoned to ask why I am saying such terrible things about her. I was able to put the record straight that she had been fed lies. In all my lectures and broadcasts I make it very clear that Susan and I get on very well together. The only thing I get angry about is that Susan has total freedom of radio, television, the press and educational outlets to present the case for the mind and brain being the same. Those of us who have started from the base that the mind and brain are separate do not have this freedom. Speaking to a few hundred at London University is a drop in the ocean. Our TV confrontation was on Cable TV going out to two blokes and a dog. I am not allowed to balance her arguments in front of millions.

I am an atheist, and a sceptic. However, I am not sceptical about the world being round and not flat because it has been proved beyond any shadow of doubt. It's the same with life after death, it's been proved but suppressed. I made it my business to repeat the same experiments that Crookes, Richet etc. took part in. My "dead" father physically materialised proving to me that we all possess two bodies, one that dies and one that survives the death of the physical body. It's all on my web site: www.cfpf.org.uk

The word "belief" does not come into subatomic physics - the study of the invisible part of the universe. After proving to myself that Crookes, Richet, Lodge etc were correct in their conclusions I beavered away looking for a rational scientific explanation to account for the revolutionary experiments where so-called dead people can fully materialise at repeatable experiments under laboratory conditions. We now have the missing mathematics to back up the experiments. This now explains why our ancestors made the terrible mistake of inventing all the dangerous and divisive religions. They witnessed the same thing that I did and jumped to the wrong conclusions. They thought the people who live in the invisible part of the universe were angels, devils, gods or worst of all, Big Daddy God himself! Sadly, most of them are just as thick and stupid as when they were on Earth. Many actually pretend to be God! When confronted by one of these characters I introduce myself as the Queen of Sheba and they push off when they find they have a raging sceptic in front of them. We have to be just as careful of idiots communicating from the etheric wavelengths as we do of the religious lunatics on Earth.

Please check out the secular case for survival after death. If you don't like it then go back to what you thought before this information reached you - when you're dead you're dead or resting in peace in the ground waiting for Judgement Day. I feel very strongly that discoveries in physics should be available to every man, woman and child on Earth for them to accept or reject as the case may be. It's just too bad if they upset the Pope, the Archbishop of Canterbury, and Prof. Stephen Hawking. People can't accept or reject anything unless they have access to it.

For 20 years I have been very frustrated at being blocked from all media outlets. However, thanks to the Internet, I am now hitting millions with the secular case for survival.

Michael Roll

Related material on this site:
 

The Chemist Sir William Crookes Proved Survival With Repeatable Experiments Under Laboratory Conditions - by Michael Roll

The Scientific Proof of Life After Death - Pamphlet by Michael Roll

A First-Hand Account of Materialisation Mediumship - Michael Roll describes an experiment he attended with the materialisation medium Rita Goold. This account was written in 1983, but was not accepted for publication until 1992.

A Critique of Susan Blackmore's Dying to Live and her Dying Brain Hypothesis - an article by Greg Stone