Dr Victor Zammit is a former Solicitor of the Supreme Court of New South Wales and the High Court of Australia: www.victorzammit.com

$1m is offered to any skeptic or anybody else who can:

i) rebut the evidence for the afterlife and

ii) prove that the afterlife does not or cannot exist.

1. For far too long, those who do not believe in the existence of the afterlife- including the hardcore skeptics, humanists, some rationalists, those sitting on the fence and the agnostics- have been unfairly but dogmatically telling us that there is nothing after death, that we do not survive physical death.

2. The closed minded skeptic in fact is saying: there is no 'life' after physical death. But the closed minded skeptic is not in a position to prove his/her assertion that the afterlife does not exist. Never. Our considerable experience dealing with the anti-survivalists, some of them academic psychologists and others, shows that the common imputed argument against survival is that there is a worldwide conspiracy by those who actually experienced communication with the afterlife to fool the rest of the world!

3. Whilst there have been and there are many scientists who have produced EVIDENCE amounting to proof for the afterlife, there has NEVER been one scientist ever in history - biologist, physicist, astronomer, engineer, psychiatrist, mathematician, or any other scientist who ever produced evidence that the afterlife does NOT exist.

4. Opposition to psychic phenomena of the afterlife has come from those who have a great deal to lose: eg University psychologists. The acceptance of the existence of the afterlife will inevitably lead to the virtual collapse of psychology as we know it to-day.

5. Subjective scepticism itself is technically a belief NOT supported by hardcore science and like religion, belongs to a 'belief system'. Beliefs in a 'belief system' such as scepticism and traditional religion are inevitably subject to fundamental errors, even subject to complete invalidation.

6. Psychic scientists and researchers duplicated objective experiences conducted overseas in at least six countries. The results are overwhelming - see the SCOLE EXPERIMENTS.

7. For the genuine searcher, the objective scientific evidence for the afterlife is available.

Questions being asked about the afterlife: will there be bliss? Will there be pain? Is life eternal? These are vitally crucial questions which scientific communication with the otherside has already answered for you! The evidence for the afterlife has NEVER been rebutted. The implications are enormous! Any applicant who wishes to prove beyond possible doubt that the afterlife does not exist will consent to three fundamental conditions: that the applicant will rebut the evidence for the afterlife, secondly to show how the afterlife does not and cannot exist. Thirdly, if any applicant fails to meet the challenge, the applicant will accept to pay all costs of expert witnesses and other litigation costs associated with the challenge.

For all enquiries: ph/fax 9453-5119 0412-562-677 Victor Zammit B.A.(Psych.),M.A.(Hist.),LL.B(Univ.NSW), Ph.D retired SOLICITOR & ATTORNEY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES and the High Court of Australia, author of A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife - irrefutable objective evidence.