THE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF SURVIVAL AFTER DEATH

By Michael Roll
Censored in Great Britain

Revised: November, 2003
Revised: May, 2003
Republished: March, 1998
Republished: April, 1997
Published: January, 1995

Copyright 1995 by Michael Roll
ISBN 0 9525021 00
Here is an extraordinary paradox. Only those who can be relied upon to dismiss the findings and conclusions of our pioneers of radio and television are allowed on radio and television!

Our scientists who support the British pioneers of radio and television - Sir William Crookes, Sir Oliver Lodge and John Logie Baird - have been blocked from speaking on the radio or appearing on television. Only a handful of local radio presenters have defied this official and unofficial censorship, notably James Whale.

There are two expert opinions as to what so-called paranormal phenomena are, but in this "free" country the British people are only allowed access to the explanation that is politically correct, the first version that is listed below, because it is no danger to the powerful religious and scientific establishments:

1. Paranormal Phenomena Do Not Exist
The mind and the brain are the same.

This is the official teaching across all scientific disciplines. The parapsychologist Dr. Susan Blackmore has been given complete freedom of every radio and television programme that is meant to be examining the subject. This is because she is the establishment mouthpiece and can be relied upon to never mention what is revealed in this pamphlet. Dr. Blackmore protects the scientific establishment's adopted stance, which only gives a materialistic model of the universe. Professor J. Wheeler, a top physicist, stated in 1994 that acceptance of survival or paranormal phenomena would destroy the basis of science as taught in our universities.
2. Paranormal Phenomena Do Exist
The mind and the brain are separate.

This pamphlet carries on where Crookes, Lodge and Logie Baird left off. This is what we are never allowed to hear on radio and television or read about in scientific magazines and large circulation papers.
"The suppression of uncomfortable ideas may be common in religion and politics, but it is not the path to knowledge, it has no place in the endeavour of science."
Carl Sagan. "Cosmos" 1980

A great moment in television history was featured in Carl Sagan's outstanding thirteen-part series on astronomy called "Cosmos". He was pictured in New York library surrounded by millions of books. He pointed to a tiny section and said:
"It is only possible in one person's lifetime to read this many books."

He then turned to the camera and made the following profound statement:
"The trick is to read the right books."

The books discussed in this pamphlet are the ones that the religious and pseudo-scientific establishments are praying with all their might that the people never find out about.
"I completely agree with Michael Roll's arguments about the reality of paranormal phenomena and the existence of a normally unseen world...

Quantum Physics: the presence of a wave nature in subatomic particles. The vital difference between a wave and a solid particle is the wave properties of superposition and modulation. Put simply, these properties allow waves of different frequencies to occupy the same space without direct interaction. Therefore it is quite possible for parallel universes to exist separated by a difference in some fundamental wave characteristic. This theory springs directly from wave mechanics which unfortunately was not available to the Victorian researchers when the greatest breakthroughs with mediumship were made."

Michael Scott BSc. Graduate in Astrophysics, Edinburgh University

WHAT IS MEANT BY SCIENTIFIC PROOF?



This must consist of repeatable experiments backed up with a theory that has a mathematical base. A good example is proving that the world is round and not flat.

The Greek scientist Pythagoras was the first to put forward the idea that the world was round. This was 2,600 years ago. However, it was 300 years later that another Greek scientist - Eratosthenes - came up with the mathematical theory for a round earth. This lacked the scientific impact it should have had because the experiment had not taken place. This came much later when Magellan's crew sailed round the world in 1522. The experiment together with the mathematical theory completely, destroyed the medieval obscurants - the Flat Earth religious fanatics.

Proving survival after death is exactly the same, but not quite as easy, because here we are dealing with phenomena that are beyond the range of our five physical senses. In order to detect this type of phenomena we have to work with a medium - a machine that can do the job.It was the invention of the achromatic microscope in 1830 by Joseph Jackson Lister that enabled his son to write his paper on antiseptic surgery. From this moment on we have had the proof that reality also exists in the invisible. Radio and television sets are also detecting normally invisible phenomena. They are mediums sorting out signals at different frequencies. This is the reason why we are forced to work with a human medium in order to prove survival after death. No machine invented so far is as sophisticated as the human mind and brain. However we have to be extra careful when carrying out experiments using people. There can be no room for error where lives are concerned.

THE EXPERIMENTAL PROOF OF SURVIVAL AFTER DEATH



We have had the experimental proof of survival after death ever since Sir William Crookes published the results of his experiments in the leading scientific journal of his day - The Quarterly Journal of Science - in 1874. These were repeatable experiments under laboratory conditions. International teams of scientists then repeated the experiments and obtained the same results. People who had once lived on earth came back and proved to these scientific teams that they had conquered death and were still very much alive.

This is what Professor Charles Richet, the French Nobel Laureate for medical science, said about the experiments:
"There is ample proof that experimental materialisations should take definite rank as a scientific fact."


The purpose of this pamphlet is only to bring to peoples' attention these exciting discoveries in subatomic physics. My job is easy, all I have to do is point to the books that have been published, but suppressed.

The main reason why this incredible scientific discovery did not cause a revolution at the beginning of this century is because these experiments lacked the backing of any detailed mathematical theory.

This is what Sir Oliver Lodge said in 1929:
"We have to be guided by the facts; and if the facts seem incredible as the they do - we have first of all to assure ourselves that they are facts, and then conclude that there is a department of knowledge to which we have as yet not got the key."


At the end of the century we now have the key, the missing mathematical theory to back up these revolutionary, scientific experiments.

References


Lodge, Sir Oliver "Phantom Walls" 1929 (Hodder & Stoughton)

Medhurst, Dr. R.G. "Crookes and the Spirit World" 1972 (Souvenir)

Crookes, Sir William "Experimental Investigation of a New Force" Article in "Quarterly Journal of Science" July 1, 1871 (Early experiments)

Richet, Professor Charles "Thirty Years of Psychical Research" 1923 (W. Collins & Sons). The French scientific team.

von Schrenck Notzing, Baron "Phenomena of Materialisations" 1923 (Kegan Paul. Trench. Trubner). The German scientific team.

Hamilton, Dr. T. Glen "Intention and Survival" 1942. (Regency Press) The Canadian scientific team.

Warrick, F. W. "Experiments in Psychics" 1939 (Rider & Co. London)

THE ETHERIC WORLD MUST HAVE AN ASTRONOMICAL LOCALITY



As Sir Oliver Lodge and Sir William Crookes were pioneers of radio and television, they were able to put forward a rational explanation to account for the seemingly "supernatural" phenomena appearing at their experiments. They said that this etheric world is the same place as our radio and television signals, but at a much higher frequency. Recent discoveries in quantum mechanics - the study of the building blocks within the atom - completely vindicate what these great physicists said at the beginning of the century.

They were adamant that we all survive the death of our physical bodies. The experiments proved that we must possess two bodies - one finite body containing the brain that dies, and another infinite body, containing the mind that separates when our short stay on earth is over. Lodge said the people from the "next world" who are appearing at the experiments must possess bodies that are made of the same invisible matter as our radio and television signals. He called it an etheric substance.

Few will disagree that the discovery of this etheric substance is the most important scientific breakthrough in history. I must admit to jumping the gun and getting overexcited when I saw a report in the "Sunday Times" on 13th December 1981. It said that physicists could have been wrong for forty years about the make-up of the universe. They were saying that nine tenths of the universe is missing. When we look through a telescope at a galaxy we are only seeing one tenth of the mass. The motion of distant galaxies and the stars in them can only be accounted for under the laws of gravity if there is far more mass associated with each galaxy than there is in the visible stars that comprise it. One theory for this missing mass was centred around a ghostlike subatomic particle called the neutrino that was discovered in 1956. The report said a neutrino would stand a good chance of penetrating a thickness of lead stretching to the nearest star without hitting anything. This really caught my imagination. Arthur Koestler showed in his book "The Roots of Coincidence" that science had discovered something in the building blocks of nature that started to give a rational explanation accounting for the millions of reports from people who say they saw a "ghost" walk through a solid wall. However, my astrophysicist pals Mike Scott and Sam Nicholls, although very supportive of the survival theory, did not share my enthusiasm that the neutrino was the missing piece needed to make up the etheric universe.

References


Lodge, Sir Oliver "Ether and Reality" 1925 (Hodder & Stoughton)

Koestler, Arthur "The Roots of Coincidence" 1972 (Hutchinson)

RONALD PEARSON BSc DISCOVERS THE UNSEEN AND NORMALLY UNSENSED UNIVERSE



"It was Einstein's materialistic Theory of Relativity that destroyed Sir Oliver Lodge's Theory of the Ether."

Sam Nicholls MSc

With the benefit of hindsight we now know that a scientific disaster took place when Sir Isaac Newton's model of the universe was discarded and replaced by Einstein's Theory of Relativity. Einstein said on his 70th birthday:
"Now you think I am looking at my life's work with calm satisfaction. But there is not a single concept of which I am convinced that it will stand firm. I am not sure if I was on the right track after all."


If only our contemporary physicists had shared Einstein's scepticism then we would not have wasted so much time and money trying to match up Niels Bohr's quantum mechanics with relativity. Even the Einstein supporter Professor Stephen Hawking from Cambridge University admits that they are incompatible. Apart from in Russia and a few "heretics" in the West, the whole of orthodox science is locked into a largely false and hopelessly outdated scientific theory. We are being subjected to one extraordinary theory after another, ranging from us being able to go back in time and murder our grandparents and then to somehow be born in another universe, to the questionable Big Bang theory that says every galaxy in the universe started from the size of a pin head at a single point in time! This is the sort of scenario we end up with if we start our calculations from a false base.

Only those of us who are outside of the university sausage machine are in a position to challenge orthodox scientific thinking. The physics students are powerless. They would not get their degrees if they told the truth. They know what happened to one of our leading scientists who had the courage to say Einstein's Theory of Relativity is incorrect. Dr. Louis Essen D.Sc. FRS, OBE, is the inventor of the atomic clock. For trying to bring common sense back into physics he was told further such activity would place the tenure of his post in jeopardy.

Into this scientific vacuum has stepped a retired university lecturer with a background in engineering, Ronald Pearson from Bath. Thankfully, Mr. Pearson no longer has to watch out for peer pressure in order to keep his university appointment. However, he is still at the mercy of the peer-referee system. This is just a euphemism for censorship - keeping the old-boy network intact. Before any scientific theory can see the light of day it has to run the gauntlet of politically correct scientists who are worshipping at the shrine of Einstein's Theory of Relativity. This way no constructive criticism ever comes to the attention of students or the public in quality scientific magazines, the press or on radio and television.

Engineers do not have the freedom to indulge in any scientific flights of fancy, otherwise all their structures will come tumbling down and their machines will blow up or crash. These practical men and women act as a sort of scientific brake. This is why many of the world's greatest scientists have come from the ranks of engineers. Ronald Pearson has discovered Sir Oliver Lodge's etheric substance and outside of Russia hardly anybody knows about it! He has completely discarded Einstein's outdated Theory of Relativity and just made a couple of additions to Sir Isaac Newton's physical laws. They now match up with quantum mechanics and provide a totally satisfactory solution for quantum gravitation. Mr. Pearson attended the Sir Isaac Newton Conference in 1991, which was held in St. Petersburg, Russia. His scientific paper has been well received and published. This outstanding British scientist is recognised in Russia, but has not even been reported in his own country. He has been peer-refereed out of the game. As a rugby player this makes me very angry because I was brought up with great respect for the good word of referee.

It is obvious that what Mr. Pearson has discovered is much too close to the truth for comfort, because if his work was a load of rubbish it would be brought out in the open and exposed. This great scientific breakthrough actually started in 1933 when Pauli predicted that there may well be particles within the atom other than the proton, electron and the recently discovered neutron that would revolutionise scientific thinking. We have now discovered over 200 subatomic particles making up our physical universe, coming under the general heading of quarks and leptons.

In order to discover the etheric world Mr. Pearson has taken a step further and pointed out that everything we have discovered so far within the atom is being produced from smaller primary particles at a sub-quantum level. His mathematically based theory proves that when primaries of positive and negative energy collide they breed! This yields an exciting new mechanism for the creation of an expanding universe. This is similar to what we are witnessing in nature all around us. An equation we can all immediately understand. Male + Female = New Individuals. It is never a bad rule of thumb to look around at nature's wonders when we are trying to find the answers to cosmic mysteries. When we consider that even a solid lump of granite consists of mostly empty space and even the building blocks of the "solid" bits protons, neutrons and electrons cannot be seen even under the most powerful microscopes. Therefore, it is no longer so fantastic to accept the seemingly crazy idea that the life force that drives our physical body on earth can continue when it packs in ("gives up the ghost"). For example, on a television interview just prior to his death in 1988, Professor Richard P. Feynman, a Nobel Laureate for Physics, made the following statement:
"If your theories and mathematics do not match the experiment, then they are wrong."


Einstein's Theory of Relativity cannot match the experiment where people who once lived on earth come back and prove they are still alive, because this theory is incompatible with even the very existence of an ether. Ronald Pearson's Theory of the Ether most certainly does. It shows the ether having a complex structure, intelligence and conscious, to be the core ingredient.

The great strength of the powerful materialists who control orthodox scientific thinking is that they are banking on the fact that most people are not making an effort to understand even basic subatomic physics. Even a cursory glance at the subject shows that the physical universe is being produced from the invisible - the etheric universe. Please spike the guns of the "when-you're-dead,-you're-dead" merchants. Read Professor Richard Feynman's layman's guide to subatomic physics obtainable from bookshops and the library - QED. Once people have read the physicists' and rationalists' case explaining so-called paranormal phenomena they automatically become immune from falling for any supernatural absurdities. Never again will the masses fall under the spell of priestcraft. Never again will people be fooled by pseudo-scientists who are guilty of suppressing uncomfortable discoveries in physics solely to keep their power structures intact.

References



Pearson, R.D. "Intelligence Behind The Universe"
This shows how enlightened physics can explain the so-called paranormal and solve the most intractable problems of cosmology.

Pearson, R.D. "Origin of Mind".
This is Mr. Pearson's lecture showing that our minds are immortal. Pearson's thesis now published in the U.S.A. by the Center for Frontier Sciences - Temple University. Philadelphia. He is still censored in his own country up to March, 1998.

Pearson, R.D. "Key To Consciousness: Quantum - Gravitation".

Feynman, Richard P. "QED". 1985 (Princeton University press)

Essen, Dr. Louis D.Sc. FRS. OBE. "Relativity - Joke or Swindle?" (Electronics & Wireless World).
This criticism of Einstein's Theory of Relativity by the inventor of the atomic clock is censored in all mainstream scientific publications. It was Rutherford who thought Einstein's Theory of Relativity was a joke!"

Quarks and Leptons: The New Elementary Particles?" Proceedings of The Royal Society of London. 8th April, 1986.

Sir William Crookes FRS and Sir Oliver Lodge FRS



Let's examine the scientific credentials of these two men who have been described as liars, cheats, cranks and frauds. Crookes has even had the label "sex maniac" tagged on for good measure. Character assassination is the modern method used in place of burning at the stake by contemporary holy inquisitors of the faith and their pseudo-scientific allies who have a great deal to lose if people ever find out that Crookes and Lodge were correct; that the subject of survival after death is a branch of physics - natural philosophy, not religion and parapsychology. Hence the following statement from Canon Michael Perry, the Editor of the journal of The Churches' Fellowship for Psychical and Spiritual Studies (Letter to me dated 25th September, 1987):
"It is the consensus of opinion amongst knowledgeable students of the subject that Crookes was sexually infatuated with the medium he worked with."


It was a materialist called Walter Mann who first floated this diabolical lie that Crookes was sexually involved with the medium he worked with. This was in the same year that Crookes died, 1919, otherwise Mann would have been on the receiving end of a hefty law suit.

The tragedy is that it is the opinion of this unqualified nonentity that just about every so-called expert in the vast life after death industry has taken as the correct version. Not the conclusions of one of the greatest and most highly qualified scientists that our country has ever produced. This vicious sexual attack has been carried on by a contemporary writer called Trevor Hall and others who are always given complete freedom of the columns of the journal of The Society for Psychical Research. Even though Ronald Pearson went to Edinburgh and met the Editor Dr. John Beloff, none of his work has appeared in the SPR journal! This biased approach is exposed in Dr. Beloff's new book, "Parapsychology: a Concise History". I quote just two passages:
"Survival research can no longer be considered part of the cutting edge of parapsychology"

"All possible mediumistic phenomena can be more economically explained, without hypothesising a surviving immaterial spirit, by appealing to the supposed psi (ESP & PK) power of the medium."


No wonder Beloff never allows the supporters of Crookes, Lodge and Baird to write in "his" SPR journal. The following is what Sir Arthur Conan Doyle wrote about the corruption in the SPR on 22nd January, 1930:
"The Society for Psychical Research seems to have become simply an anti-spiritual organisation. Everything which tends to prove survival, no matter how honourable or sane the source may be, is assailed by suppression, misrepresentation and every sort of unreasonable and vicious opposition... the society has done no constructive work of any importance, and has employed its energies in hindering and belittling those who are engaged in real active psychical research. The influence of the society is entirely for evil."


I have informed the Secretary of The Royal Society about the treatment that is being meted out to their ex-President by the SPR. The reply I received showed that The Royal Society is part of this conspiracy to keep the truth from the people. The letter said The Royal Society has a long-standing policy dating from the 17th century (this was when the Vatican was murdering and persecuting scientists - Giordano Bruno & Galileo) never to "meddle" into life after death. They have a pact with the priests! This was confirmed when Professor Stephen Hawking came on television following his meeting with the Pope. Hawking reported that the Pope said to him
"I do not care what you do, just so long as you do not encroach on in my subject - life after death."


Here we have a clear case of the religionists and materialists working together to block the scientific proof of survival after death.

Ronald Pearson was very well received when he lectured to Professor Stephen Hawking's students at Cambridge University. Hawking holds the same post at Cambridge that was once occupied by Sir Isaac Newton. Pearson is following Newton but not Hawking. We now have a simple choice. Hawking's "death is the end of everything" or Crookes' and Pearson's survival theory. Just look at Crookes's credentials:
Sir William Crookes FRS (1832-1919) (Order of Merit and President of The Royal SocietyO.M. 1910. President of the Royal Society. LL.D (Birmingham) D.Sc. (Oxon., Camb., Ireland, Cape of Good Hope, Sheffield, Durham). Foreign Secretary Royal Society, 1908-12. President Chemical Society. Brit. Assoc. Inst. Elect. Eng., Soc. Chem. Industry Hon. Mem. Royal Phil. Soc. Glasgow. Royal Society. N. S. W. Pharm. Soc.. Chem. Metal. & Mining Soc. of South Africa. Amer. Chem. Soc.. Amer. Philos. Soc.. Royal Soc. Sci. Upsala. Deutsche Chem. Gesell. Berlin. Psychol. Soc. Paris. Antonio Alzate Sci. Soc. Mexico. Sci. Soc. Bucharest. Reg.. Accad Zetanli: Foreign Mem. Lincei. Rome. Corresp. Inst. de France (Acad. Lincei. Rome). Corresp, Inst. de France (Acad. Sci): Corresp. Mem. Bataafsch. Genoots. Rotterdam. Soc. & Encouragement pour L'lnd. Paris.. For. Assoc. National Acad. Sciences. Washington. Foreign Member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Royal Medallist. Davy Medallist. Copley Medallist. And three times Bakerian Lecturer of the Royal Society. Proprietor and Editor of Chemical News. Knighted.


Now look at the conclusions of Sir Oliver Lodge:
"I have been in touch with the minds of certain people who have parted from their bodies. How can a mind get in touch with us when it has no body? It must borrow some material form; but because "spirits" are discarnate it does not mean they have no bodies. They have substantial bodies, not made up of matter, but as I think of ether."


The physics laboratory at Liverpool University is named after Sir Oliver Lodge. This is the man the "experts" (parapsychologists) on paranormal phenomena are calling gullible whenever they get the chance. I don't think a physics laboratory would be named after a scientist who was gullible. Sir Oliver was the first person to transmit a message by radio on 14th August 1894. The reason why Lodge's contribution to radio has been played down is solely because he dared to say that paranormal phenomena is in fact a branch of physics. See how his credentials match those of Crookes:
Sir Oliver Lodge FRS (1851-1940) (Fellow of the Royal Society)D.Sc.(Lond): Hon. D.Sc.(Oxon): Hon. Sc.D. (Cantab.).. Hon.LL.D. (Liverpool. Manchester. Sheffield. Adelaide. Toronto). Hon. M.A. (Birmingham): Mem. Inst. Elec. Engineers. Hon. Mem. Lit. Phil. Soc. (Manchester), Corr. Nem. Amer. Phil. Soc. (Philadelphia). Corr. Mem. Accad. Sci. dell'lstituto (Bologna). Corr. Mem. Bataafsch Genoots (Rotterdam). Hon. Mem. Inst. Elec. Engineers.. President of the Radio Society: Rumford Medallist of the Royal Society: Albert Medallist of the Royal Society of Arts. as Pioneer in Wireless Telegraphy., President of the Physical Society. President of the British Ass. President of the Rontgen Society.. Professor of Physics in the University of Liverpool.. Principal of the University of Birmingham. Knighted.


The following statements prove there is a conspiracy to suppress uncomfortable discoveries in subatomic physics; that there is an unholy alliance between pseudo-scientists fighting to keep their power-structures intact, and priests who are fighting to defend their faiths and therefore keep their monopoly on the life after death industry. The scientific conspiracy is encapsulated in this statement by Adrian Berry, the Science Correspondent of The Daily Telegraph:
"Few subjects more infuriate scientists than claims of paranormal phenomena because, if confirmed, the whole fabric of science would be threatened."


Science is derived from the Latin word for seeking after knowledge. Scientific endeavour as such can never be contested as wrong, but current orthodox scientific thinking most certainly can, especially if the wrong beacon is being followed - Einstein's Theory of Relativity - flawed by internal contradictions and incompatible with both Quantum Theory and the Ether Theory. The following statement from The Rev'd Don Cupitt, Dean of Emmanuel College, Cambridge University encompasses the religious conspiracy:
"Somehow, everybody knows that Christianity is the Church and the Church is a power-structure, an apparatus for limiting freedom in belief and morals."


In 1939 the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr. Cosmo Lang, suppressed the findings of his own Church of England Commission that was positive towards the fact that international teams of scientists had proved by repeatable experiments that we have a soul: that the mind is separate from the brain, and that it is a scientific fact that we all survive death, not just Christians after some mythical judgement day. This is what Bishop George Appleton of Oxford University said to me in a letter dated 26th March, 1982:

"The report you quote of the commission appointed by Cosmo Lang indicated that it was a subject that ought to be taken seriously by Christians, and I welcome your quotation from Bishop Mervyn Stockwood, a friend of mine."

References



Baird, John Logie "Sermons, Soap and Television" 1988 from The Royal Television Society £4.75p post paid. Tavistock Square. London WC1H 9HR.
Page 65 shows a picture of Baird with his new invention - the infra-red camera - working with Sir Oliver Lodge. Baird tells how the "dead" American genius Thomas Alva Edison helped him, making contact through a medium. Baird goes on to tell how one of his scientific colleagues took the finger-prints of an etheric person. These proved to be identical to the ones on the dead physical body. This is proof of survival - irrefutable proof that would be accepted by a court of law.

Constable, A "Early Wireless" 1980 (Midas Books).
This book makes it very clear there would be no radio or television if it had not been for Crookes and Lodge. Crookes is even in the dictionary for his work on the cathode ray tube.

"Lodging a Claim to Radio Fame". An article by Charles Arthur in the 'New Scientist".
Reviewing a new biography on Sir Oliver Lodge by Brian Austin. 16th July, 1994
In 1993, after a great deal of pressure, The Radio Authority removed the censorship clause from their broadcasting code. People had been banned from talking about survival after death on the air in a serious, scientific manner in this "free" country! Until the Church is disestablished, this assault on freedom of speech will continue. The BBC television series "Heretic" exposed the fact that the engineer Professor Robert Jahn was sacked from his senior position at Princeton University, USA for telling the truth, that so-called paranormal phenomena is a branch of subatomic physics. This was followed by a Sky Television documentary showing Prof. Jahn connecting survival after death with quantum mechanics - wave/particle duality - something that is natural and normal.

Crawford, W.J. D.Sc. "The Reality of Psychical Phenomena". (E.P. Dutton & Company) 1918.

SURVIVALISTS ARE NOT SPIRITUALISTS



This pamphlet is aimed at my fellow secularists (non-religionists) like Prof. Richard Dawkins of the Department of Zoology at Oxford University. He is one of the handful of academics with the courage to come out in the open and warn how dangerous it is to believe in the mythology of priestcraft. His article "Is Religion Just a Disease?", published in the Daily Telegraph on 15th December 1993, has gone a long way to making people start to think for themselves. The scientist Arthur C. Clarke has also waded in against the peddlers of divisive, supernatural fiction who still have almost total control of education and all the means of mass communication backed up with unlimited funds. Clarke is reported to have said in The Sunday Times Review on 16th October, 1994:

"The greatest tragedy in mankind's entire history may be the hijacking of morality by religion... here are sanctimonious nitwits calling for a return to morals based on superstition."


What really beggars the mind is that even freethinkers like Dawkins and Clarke have still fallen for the highly efficient religious propaganda machine that all scientists who say we survive death are "Spiritualists"! Spiritualism is an officially recognised monotheistic religion. Nobody who has escaped from the clutches of priestcraft could possibly enter a place called a church and take part in a service, listening to a minister of religion reading from the bible and asking us to sing hymns under the sign of the cross, the symbol of the greatest killing machine that the world has ever witnessed. But this is the mud that has stuck.

The Rev'd Don Cupitt in his television series "Sea of Faith" is guilty of spreading this propaganda. He praised the writer and scientist Sir Arthur Conan Doyle MD, then made out that Doyle had somehow gone mad and started "dabbling in Spiritualism". Again the truth is completely opposite. Scientists never dabble in anything, they always make a very careful study of their subject. It is the victims of priestcraft who are dabbling in things, not scientists and philosophers. This is also the mud that has stuck to Sir William Crookes in spite of the fact that he made the following statements:
"Cut out the Spiritualist jargon... Spiritualists look upon scientific investigation as a desecration of their shrine."


It is exactly the same today. Many Spiritualists, but not all, have been fighting just as hard as their fellow religionists at the Vatican to block the scientific backup for what mediums have been saying - that our loved ones are not dead. Secular scientists and philosophers (derived from the Greek word for seekers after knowledge) would rather die themselves than kill anybody. The only deadly weapon in our armoury is the sheer weight of logical argument. Survivalists can live next door and be great friends with materialists, just differing over the nature of our existence on earth.

The only way I can win Prof. Richard Dawkins over to accepting survival after death is if I keep hitting him with scientific facts. When people fully materialise from the etheric world at our experiments, they answer all the questions we fire at them. This then becomes hearsay, not scientific facts. I hit Prof. Dawkins with hearsay at my peril. This mountain of hearsay coming from the people in the "next world" is very interesting, but we can only put this in our pending tray as something to think about. It is only the priests who want you grovelling before them and blindly believing in their supernatural, divisive doctrines and dogmas. Scientists and philosophers want you standing up straight with your head held high, very carefully checking everything that is said. We must all remove the dreadful priestly word "belief" from our vocabularies. Untold millions have died solely because they did not believe in the same supernatural mythology as the person in the next street, village, town, city or country. Look at priest-ridden Northern Ireland, the Middle East, India and most of all Bosnia - the cause of the First World War and therefore indirectly, the Second World War.

References



Findlay, Arthur "On the Edge of the Etheric" 1931 (The Psychic Press)
From Psychic News Bookshop. Clock Cottage. Stansted Hall, Essex CM24 8UD.Sagan, Carl "Cosmos" 1980 (Macdonald)
This book together with Sagan's thirteen-part television series started the thinking revolution. Millions found out overnight what every intellectual already knew - that our official history books are a pack of lies. That it was the Christians who destroyed education in the Roman Empire and plunged the known world into the Dark Ages.

Gundry, D.W. The Churches Correspondent of the "Telegraph" made the following report:
"The holocaust could never have taken place had it not been for the theological thinking of Christendom about Jews, and their ostracism by the Christians of Europe, the Bishop of Birmingham - Dr. Hugh Montefiore - told the clergy of Stepney yesterday."

I know it sounds daft, but Christians actually blame the Jews for killing their god!

The Germans, like the Irish, are not pretending they really believe in priestcraft. Therefore, it was easy for Hitler to whip up hatred against the Jews.

Martin Luther, the German Christian hero and founder of the Protestant movement, said in 1543:
"The synagogues should be set on fire and Jewish homes likewise destroyed."


At his trial in 1946 the Nazi Jew-baiter, Julius Streicher, actually claimed that Luther ought to be in the dock:
"Dr. Martin Luther would very probably be sitting in my place in the defendants' dock today if this book had been taken into consideration by the Prosecution. In the book 'On The Jews and Their Lies', Dr. Martin Luther writes that the Jews are a serpent's brood and one should burn down their synagogues and destroy them..."
(Source: Martin Luther's dirty little book: On the Jews and their lies, by Jim Walker (1998))


This pamphlet is also dedicated to fellow freethinkers, Professor Peter Atkins of the Dept. of Chemistry at Oxford University and the American philosopher Gore Vidal.

"All theology is gobbledygook" - Professor Peter Atkins"The one-god religions are easily the greatest disaster ever to be inflicted on the human race."
- Gore Vidal


I shudder to think what Gore Vidal must think of the Christian-sponsored victor in the October 1994 USA elections who made the following statement on a TV interview:
"Now that we have taken over the Senate and the House of Representatives we can get this Darwin nonsense out of our schools and replace it with the Bible."


It will be impossible to keep the truth from reaching the people for much longer. Contemporary obscurants with a great deal to lose are fighting just as hard as the medieval lot. As the Duke of Wellington said at Waterloo:
"It is hard pounding, we shall just see who can pound the hardest."

CONTEMPORARY MATERIALISATION EXPERIMENTS



Nothing happened yesterday in the laws of physics that does not happen today.

All those who have taken part in contemporary experiments with materialisation mediums are in a position to mark all the work and conclusions of our ancestors who had no knowledge of subatomic physics. When people with no scientific knowledge witnessed the same phenomena - they understandably thought that something supernatural had taken place. This is why Jesus was made into the 17th saviour-god known to historians when he was reported to have come back and proved to his friends that he had conquered death. It was something natural, not supernatural that led to the invention of all the divisive religions throughout the world. I met my "dead" father at an experiment. He was a very good cricketer, but definitely not the creator of the universe.

Now that we are armed with the missing mathematics it is important to repeat the pioneering experiments of Crookes, Richet and others, using Logie Baird's infrared camera which has now been perfected, together with other sophisticated equipment. The mediums are also improving. Crookes only had one etheric person to work with and she had "died" so long ago that they were unable to get any relations to take part in his experiments. This part of the scientific exercise has now been carried out very successfully. The Jeffery family have been reunited with their "dead" sixteen year old son, who was killed on his motorcycle, in over 100 repeatable experiments. The Byrne family have been reunited with their nine year old son, who "died" of cancer, on something like 100 repeatable experiments. Gwen has just published her book which is giving tremendous comfort to all mothers and fathers who have gone through the same hell on earth, losing a child.

Come on you journalists and broadcasters, these families are waiting to be interviewed and to share their wonderful experience with every person in the world.Number one priority must now be to actually capture on film recently deceased people being physically reunited with their friends and relations on Earth. Professor Gary Schwartz of the University of Arizona has the funding and equipment required, and is ready to proceed with repeatable experiments under laboratory conditions as soon as a first class materialisation medium comes forward and dedicates his or her gift to proving survival after death. The British Nobel Laureate for Physics, Professor B.D. Josephson, has put in writing to me that he will take part in the experiments just as long as they fit in with his busy schedule. And so will Professor Peter Wadhams (Ocean Physics), also from Cambridge University - a very different attitude to the scientific bigotry encountered by Sir William Crookes, judging by this quote taken from Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's book "The Vital Message", 1919:

"Sir William Crookes appealed to Sir George Stokes, the Secretary of the Royal Society, to come down to his laboratory and see the experiments but he took no notice."


It is asking a lot for a medium to work with scientists to prove survival after death, because they have to put their lives in the hands of those who carry out the experiments. They are all very nervous; they know what happened to Helen Duncan. I have experienced first hand the hatred from those in authority who will be ruined if millions find out the truth. Remember it was the lucky mediums whom the Church burnt at the stake or drowned, the vast majority were slowly tortured to death in order to get more names for the holy inquisitors of the faith to get stuck into in the Renaissance. The only way to defend a supernatural faith is to keep the truth from the masses.

The hatred coming from the scientific side today is even worse than the Church. I have a letter from Dr. John Habgood, the Archbishop of York saying, they are now taking the subject more seriously, and have a department within the Church looking into paranormal phenomena. This is not the case with orthodox science. Every scientific text book in the world will have to be rewritten when the people find out we should not have ditched Sir Isaac Newton for Einstein.

References



Byrne, Gwen "Russell" 1994.
Gwen has set up her own society for grieving parents - The Pink Panther Society. I have sent this paper to all the members of the Pink Panther Society. A mother who had lost a son kindly wrote the following:
"After reading your scientific thesis my pillow is now dry at night, I am a different woman."

One does not get paid for fighting the corrupt establishment forces but I would not swap the happiness that this has given me for a million pounds.

Crossley, Alan E "The Story of Helen Duncan: Materialisation Medium" 1975 (Arthur H. Stockwell Ltd. Devon).
Helen was convicted under the Witchcraft Act and went to prison in 1944. She was killed as the result of a police raid in 1956.
Unfortunately no scientific work was carried out with Helen Duncan before she died. However, we do have the reports that were submitted by a team of magicians headed by William Goldston - the founder of the Magicians Club. Goldston and his colleagues were astounded when their "dead" friend materialised, the magician The Great Lafayette. Being true to the codes of conduct demanded by the Magic Circle, Goldston wrote a report to the Psychic News confirming that Helen Duncan's mediumship was genuine, and that no magician could possibly duplicate the phenomena that he and his fellow magicians had witnessed.
Notice that the magician James Randi and his pals on the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP) are always very careful not to bring this report to the public's attention.
I have claimed the £1,000,000 offered by James Randi, sending him proof that Prof. John Hasted of the physics department at London University had proved that so-called psychic phenomena exist. This is when we find out that these public offers of money are a hoax. What Randi does not tell us on TV is that we first of all have to satisfy, his own twelve conditions. He does not recognise the findings of qualified, independent scientists. His conditions are so outrageous that he will never have to part with any money!
Granada TV gave Randi his own series, "James Randi Psychic Investigator". This fraud was exposed by Garry Bushell of The Sun. On 8th August, 1991 Garry asked why those scientists who claim there is a rational case for life after death have been kept off the programme? He also asked why the comments from the astrophysicist Sam Nicholls MSc were cut from the show on mediums.
Dr. Susan Blackmore, who proudly boasts a certificate from Randi's (CSICOP) organisation, was given the freedom of the Channel 4 "Comment" slot to put the case for the mind dying with the brain. I was officially blocked from giving a balance! The Producer Andrew Curry wrote and told me he is not responsible for the sins and iniquities of the entire British broadcasting system, making it clear that the censorship had come from above, not from him. (Letter dated 8th February, 1988)

Milton, Richard "Forbidden Science" 1994 Forth Estate Ltd.
This book exposes CSICOP as a front organisation for orthodox scientific thinking. Their members are acting as inquisitors of the faith. Blocking any connection between survival and physics.

THOMAS PAINE AND ARTHUR FINDLAY



From now on let's follow the survivalist philosophers (thinkers) and not the priests (believers). We only have to turn on the radio and television or open up the papers to see what a mistake it is to believe in the supernatural mythology invented by priests in the Dark Ages. The French Thomas Paine - Voltaire - sums up in a few words how dangerous it is to believe what "teachers" with a vested interest are desperate to pump into us:
"People who believe absurdities commit atrocities."


The priests know as much about the power in the universe that creates galaxies and puts life onto planets as the average pussy cat - nothing whatsoever. There is no greater crime in the cosmos than to deliberately indoctrinate young trusting minds with false teachings for selfish ends. From this one heinous crime stems all crime.All we have to do to find out very quickly how badly we have been deceived by our leaders and teachers is to read just two suppressed books. Thomas Paine's "The Age of Reason" and Arthur Findlay's "The Curse of Ignorance". If only we had been following the survivalist philosophers - Pythagoras, Socrates, Plato, Paine and Findlay - then nobody would have been killed in any crazy religious squabbles.Arthur Findlay says we only need just two codes of ethics for our short stay on planet earth. This is philosophy, not religion:
"Do unto others as you would have others do unto you."


Even the materialists go along with this because it makes sense. However, the next code is very difficult, if not impossible for them to take on board:
"As you sow, so you will reap."


At the risk of upsetting Prof. Richard Dawkins I am going along with this hearsay that most etheric people hit us with whenever they make contact through a medium. I am going along with it because it makes sense. These etheric people are adamant that we are all personally responsible and liable for our thoughts and actions on earth. This, they say, determines our surroundings in the etheric world. Let's all make a big effort to leave happiness in our wake wherever we go, not misery.

Dawkins, Atkins, Clarke and Vidal will not wince if we talk to them about love as opposed to hatred. This is the battle on earth and in the etheric world. Love and kindness overcoming and defeating misery and hate. This is the reason why we have to be extra careful of what is being said through mediums. Rotten people on earth are just as nasty in the "next world", and also just as stupid and gullible. The only danger is not to recognise this fact.

References



The Curse of Ignorance - by Arthur Findlay (1947), published in two volumes, and details of some of Findlay's other works.
This is the true history of mankind, totally different to the pack of lies taught in a country where the Church and state are established. This passage sums up just how badly the British people have been deceived:
"Such, however, is still [the Church's] influence that this book, which tells the story of the past honestly and fearlessly, will be kept out of our schools and universities by the authorities, and consequently, only in later life will those with enquiring minds discover the truth."

Findlay finishes with a call to the people of the world to throw off the shackles of priestcraft, to make a choice between two paths:
"One is the Secular way (non religious) and the other is the Theological (religious); one is the Democratic and the other the Despotic; one is the sane and the other the insane."


Paine, Thomas "The Age of Reason" 1794.Thomas Paine was wanted dead or alive in England for daring to fight against slavery and campaigning for all men and women to have the vote. He even submitted a detailed plan for a welfare state. Those caught reading Paine's books were heavily fined or transported to Australia. His pamphlet "Common Sense" was the spark that caused the American and French revolutions. However, this enemy of tyranny has been written out of our history books because exactly 200 years ago he published his banned masterpiece, "The Age of Reason". This challenged the beliefs, power and wealth of the Christian Church. Telling the truth was his downfall:
"Of all the tyrannies that affect mankind, tyranny in religion is the worst; every other species of tyranny is limited to the world we live in, but this attempts to stride beyond the grave, and seeks to pursue us into eternity."


It is now time we introduced this book into every school in the country. As things stand at the moment students do not have access to the intellectual criticism of religion that has been gathered from Paine right through to Prof. Richard Dawkins. Without this balance it is very difficult to distinguish between what is history, and what is mythology.Contrast the philosophy of Thomas Paine with this passage from the bible, which we are told is the word of God - the creator of the universe:
"My country is the world, and my religion is to do good." - Thomas Paine"I give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron, thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel."
(Psalm 2: 8-9)


Hence the Christian slave trade and colonialism. Even today the law of Britain demands that this evil rubbish is taught to every school child as the word of god!

Kenneth Griffith's documentary on Thomas Paine - The Most Valuable Englishman Ever. Somehow, this documentary crept past the BBC censors and was broadcast in 1982. All requests to the BBC for a repeat have so far been ignored. However, in spite of this appalling censorship, the English people are finding out about their greatest ever philosopher - the English Voltaire.

Every fighter for philosophical freedom should make it their business to visit Thetford in Norfolk where Thomas was born or Lewes in Sussex where he lived for six years before emigrating to the U.S.A. Walk in the footsteps of this artisan who did more than anybody to free the world from slavery and the curse of priestcraft.

Many Heathens Say We Have a Soul - Modern Theologians Say We Don't!



I started with a paradox and I shall end with one.

A heathen is a person who has not had his or her brains scrambled by Jewish, Christian or Muslim priests. An atheist is a person who flatly refuses to grovel to a mythical, supernatural, supreme being with power over the laws of nature - a big daddy god in the sky invented by ancient priests in order to keep themselves in the lap of luxury and the masses in fear, ignorance and servitude.

The heathens and atheists are now saying we have a soul that parts from our dead physical bodies!

Many Christian priests have now changed their minds about this. According to a report in The Sunday Telegraph Review on 13th November, 1994:
"Modern theology no longer allows that the soul should leave the body after death ... Last week Dr. John Habgood, Archbishop of York, was reported as saying that 'nothing departs the body when you die'."


Dr. Habgood has a First Class Honours degree in Physics from Cambridge University. No prizes will be given to those who guess correctly which scientific philosophy he is following - Einstein's Relativity or Newton's Ether?

The following immortal words from Carl Sagan should be written over the entrance to even school and university in the world:
"INTELLECTUAL CAPACITY IS NO GUARANTEE AGAINST BEING DEAD WRONG."


My mother was able to give me the antidote to the rubbish that my teachers tried to pump into me, but what about everybody else who is not lucky enough to have a free thinking mother like mine?

Well done all those involved with the BBC "Horizon" science programme. On 16th May, 1994 they exposed the fact that an Australian, Dr. Robin Warren, discovered bugs living in our stomach acid. This has been suppressed for over ten years by the medical profession because of the vast amount of money being made by the drug companies producing anti-acid pills. These stomach bugs can be quickly destroyed and millions will not be forced to buy expensive pills to relieve stomach pain. This programme was repeated on 5th December, 1994.

At last the people are finding out just how badly they are being fixed. But they still do not know that we have had a rational, scientific explanation to account for so-called paranormal phenomena for over 100 years, ever since 1874 when Sir William Crookes submitted his paper to the Quarterly Journal of Science.

Scottish-born journalist John Swinton (1829-1901) had the courage to blow the whistle on the corrupt establishment forces at a banquet given in his honour by colleagues in New York in 1880. When someone present proposed a toast to an independent press, Swinton responded:

"There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."

(Source: Labor's Untold Story, by Richard O. Boyer and Herbert M. Morais, published by United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, NY, 1955/1979.)


At the end of 1994 the Irish Government collapsed when it was revealed that the Roman Catholic Church and politicians had conspired to protect a priest who was guilty of physical child abuse. Thankfully, very few priests would commit such a heinous crime, but what about mental child abuse?

They all stand guilty of this assault on the young, trusting minds of children.

No wonder they have invented a saviour-god who is going to forgive all their sins. This is why the Christian religion is so attractive to the Mafia and the IRA. Let's think very carefully about these words of the German philosopher Johann Most (1846-1906):
"The more man clings to religion, the more he believes. The more he believes, the less he knows. The less he knows, the more stupid he is. The more stupid, the easier he can be governed! The easier to govern, the better he may be exploited. The more exploited, the poorer he gets. The poorer he gets, the richer and mightier the domineering classes get, the more riches and power they amass, the heavier their yoke upon the neck of the people."

(Source: The God Pestilence (1883) by Johann Most)

WHAT WE ARE NEVER TOLD AT SCHOOL



Have you ever wondered why hardly any intellectual criticism of religion ever reaches students and the general public? This is because it is against the law! There is a very sinister clause in the common law offence of blasphemous libel. Nobody is allowed to say anything that may "upset Christians" - those who have been indoctrinated to believe that 2,000 years ago a virgin gave birth to a saviour-god called Christ - the creator of the universe no less. If you do not accept that Jesus is God, then you are most certainly not a Christian. There is no doubt that telling the true history of the formation of the religion of Christianity really upsets those who believe in priestcraft.

In order to make sure students never find out about the Council of Nicaea in AD 325 there is a priest or a religionist on the board of governors of every school in the country. They insist the ancient Christian laws of the land are enforced. The only way to defend a supernatural faith is to make sure the masses never find out where it was invented. It was at The Council of Nicaea where the all-embracing (Catholic) doctrines and dogmas were put together by appallingly ignorant priests. It was here that a survivalist philosopher known as Jesus was officially made into God - the second person in a trinity of gods, but three gods in one. Mythology gone mad. To check this, look up Nicene Creed in the dictionary. We have an excellent historical record of this infamous council that hardly anybody knows about. To try and make Great Britain a free country, the Law Commission recommended in 1982 that the law of blasphemous libel be abolished. Sadly the Christians who control the Conservative Government flatly refused to take action on this recommendation. I have a letter from the Law Commission dated 22nd June 1982. I will send a copy to every student who sends a stamped addressed envelope. The Labour Government also refuse to act.
"All it requires for the forces of evil, bigotry, superstition and ignorance to keep their grip on the minds of the people is that good men and women continue to do nothing."
After Voltaire
It is a tragedy that Christians have declared war on the reported teachings of Jesus and all the other survivalist philosophers who taught that we are all liable for our actions on earth - "as you sow, so you will reap". Instead of guiding us along the path of goodness, the priests have invented their saviour-god who will forgive all our "sins", just so long as we kowtow to them and ask for forgiveness. There is a very good reason why the Oxford University philosopher, Professor Sir A. J. Ayer, made the following statement on the front page of the first edition of the Mail on Sunday:
"Christianity is morally outrageous and intellectually contemptible."
And this is what the law of Great Britain insists is taught to all our children without any free thinker giving a balance. Have you wondered what Muslims are doing isolated in Bosnia?

This is because of a bust-up over the Holy Ghost!

In 1453 the Muslims had decided to do something about the lunatics (Crusaders) arriving from Europe and killing every man, woman and child they came across. Their vast army was massing across the Bosporus preparing to strike at the Orthodox Christians in Constantinople. The Orthodox Christians pleaded with the Catholic Christians in Rome to come and help keep the Muslims out of Europe. The Catholics said they would only send their army if the Orthodox Christians agreed that the Holy Ghost came from the Son as well as from the Father! Eventually, in desperation, the Orthodox Christians pretended to agree, but it was too late. The Muslims got to Austria before they were pushed back to the toe-hold they now have in Europe (Istanbul).

There is a golden rule we can learn from all this crazy, religious killing. Never believe anything anybody tells us - check all the facts very carefully. Let's all be sceptics, but not bigots, masters of our own ship. In Northern Ireland we only have Christians killing each other - Roman Catholics v Protesting Catholics. However, in Bosnia we have Croats (Roman Catholics) v Serbs (Orthodox Christians) v Muslims. The First World War started because of Britain, France, Germany, Austria, Russia and Turkey getting mixed up with these cowboys - all fighting over nothing whatsoever.

References



"The Psychic Stream" by Arthur Findlay. Psychic Press. The Source and Growth of the Christian Faith.

The Curse of Ignorance - by Arthur Findlay (1947), published in two volumes, and details of some of Findlay's other works.
This is the true history of mankind, totally different to the pack of lies taught in a country where the Church and state are established. This passage sums up just how badly the British people have been deceived:
"Such, however, is still [the Church's] influence that this book, which tells the story of the past honestly and fearlessly, will be kept out of our schools and universities by the authorities, and consequently, only in later life will those with enquiring minds discover the truth."

Findlay finishes with a call to the people of the world to throw off the shackles of priestcraft, to make a choice between two paths:
"One is the Secular way (non religious) and the other is the Theological (religious); one is the Democratic and the other the Despotic; one is the sane and the other the insane."


The Suppression of Knowledge - A pamphlet by Michael Roll
"There is no greater crime in the cosmos than to deliberately indoctrinate young trusting minds with false teachings for selfish ends. From this one heinous crime stems all crime. The perpetrators of this evil deed will pay a terrible price in mental remorse when they pass from this world."


"A History of Christianity" - A Page-by-Page Criticism of Paul Johnson's Horror Story - A pamphlet by Michael Roll
"Your little booklet is terrific. It deserves wide distribution. It highlights the absurdity of the situation in this country where everybody pussyfoots around a religion that nobody (except the wilfully ignorant) believes any more. This has been the state of things for over a century now."

Tony Grist (ex-priest, now freelance journalist)

TO FIND OUT MORE ABOUT THE HEARSAY



For those who are keen to find out what etheric people say in answer to our questions, I recommend the books of the etheric philosopher Silver Birch. He says if I insult your intelligence or offend your reason, then reject what I am saying. Not a bad start. There is a very good reason why he uses many words that are deeply offensive to secularists and all those who have read Paine and Findlay together with the history of religious genocide. Silver Birch's only outlet has been via the religion of Spiritualism. He knows if he did the same as Arthur Findlay, hitting everything on a rational basis, he would then receive the same treatment and fail to get his message across. He gently deprogrammes the refugees from Christianity who have been attracted to, and taken over the once scientifically minded Spiritualist movement.

"Now your world has seen the havoc wrought and the benefits that can be obtained by nuclear fission. The basis of materialism has been split altogether: the indissoluble atom has been dissolved. Scientists accept that matter is not solid, and that reality is to be found in the invisible.

"Silver Birch, "Light from Silver Birch" (1983)


Silver Birch goes onto say if we can tell just one person about these suppressed discoveries in subatomic physics, then our lives will have been worthwhile. If we all make an effort to tell just three people, then this brings into play the incredible mathematics of a chain letter. In a very short time everybody knows. Dave Barrett of Live TV and James Stannage of Radio Piccadilly, are helping me to tell millions, so are thousands of others. The powerful forces that are ranged against the people will not be able to hold out for much longer. Very shortly they will be swept aside by public opinion just like the Berlin Wall and Communism in Russia.

Ask Psychic Press for details of the books by Silver Birch: Clock Cottage, Stansted Hall, Stansted, Essex CM24 8UD England

"A man or a woman who is a medium or a spiritist among you must be put to death ..."

Leviticus 20.27 (New International Version of the Bible. 1979)


The word of God, my foot, it is obviously the word of evil priests making sure the opposition are rubbed out.

To all Journalists, Broadcasters and Educationalists



Immediately the third of the philosophies listed below has equal media coverage to numbers one and two, then the survivalists' fight for philosophical freedom will be over.

1.When you are dead, you're dead.

The materialists' case for the mind dying with the brain, as put forward by the parapsychologists and orthodox scientific teaching across all disciplines from philosophy through to physics. They all follow Einstein's materialistic model of the universe.
2.Resting in peace in the ground waiting for the Second Coming of the Christian saviour-god (Judgement Day)

Only believers in this god called Christ stand any chance of survival, all the rest will rot in hell forever without any chance of getting out. The supernatural doctrines and dogmas of priestcraft.
3.The mind and brain are separate - we all survive death.

This is backed up by crushing scientific proof. This is the secularists' - non-religious - case that says we are all immediately reunited with our loved ones who have gone before us. The subject of survival is physics - natural philosophy. Following Christiaan Huygen's and Sir Oliver Lodge's Theory of the Ether, then extending Sir Isaac Newton's model of the universe to match up with recent discoveries in subatomic physics.


Survivalists are not out to convert or convince anybody. If people do not like the idea of surviving death immediately their physical bodies pack in, then they can always go back to what they thought before this information reached them. However, discoveries in physics belong to every man, woman and child on earth, it is their birthright, it is just too bad if the truth upsets powerful religionists and materialists who will be ruined if millions find out what is being suppressed.

Deceiving the people is a very dangerous game to play.
P