The flaw sent to many scientific journals was rejected by all, on grounds it was established physics.(10)
But see what an eminent physicist says of the final version sent:

Prof. Davies responded by sending Guth’s theory of ‘inflation’ that is the main part of that theory.

This is known to give a false prediction called, ‘The Problem of the Cosmological Constant’.
It refers to the rate of expansion of the universe that is a number so many times too high as to dwarf to insignificance even the number of atoms in the universe.

I was horrified to discover flawed logic on nearly every line!
This betrayed an inadequate understanding of mechanics and thermodynamics. The wrong prediction was no longer surprising.

The theory is still established in 2014.

The draft sent by Davies was to go in a new book to be published in 1989(2).
He would not comment on the list of flaws I returned but clearly some notice had been taken since the theory presented on pages 57 to 59 had been modified.
But the errors are still there!

I realised the solution had to incorporate an opposite kind of energy to replace the “intrinsic negative pressure” that Guth had wrongly relied upon to allow creation from the void.
I set to work to derive a viable replacement theory.
This avoided the false prediction but needed to be extended to cope with speeds up to that of light.

On studying Einstein’s theories of relativity, to provide the extension needed, it became clear that they could not be incorporated.
They contained internal contradiction and were incompatible with the background medium being introduced.
In any case, the assumptions made relativity incompatible with quantum theory.
So what seemed at first a daunting challenge had to be attempted.
This meant finding a satisfactory alternative mechanics.

Amazingly this turned out to be very easy and a new general equation for ‘Exact Classical Mechanics’ had appeared within a couple of days.

However, I do have to admit I had some etheric help in quantifying the non-uniformity of density of the background medium that was to replace Einstein’s ‘curved space-time’.

A book by Novikov (1983)(1) seemed to light up on a shelf in the library. I opened it at random and, right where I was looking on that very page was the clue I needed! I had been guided by a mind not my own.

The theory matched every experimental check just as well as did Einstein’s special and general theories of relativity.

All journals refused publication on grounds that the acceptance of Einstein’s theories as basic starting point was mandatory: no alternative was admissible.

Dr Essen said that, since it was impossible to publish critiques or alternatives to Einstein’s theories in the West, I should try Russia.(3)
He invited me to go there as his deputy.

Another incentive was a demand from the editor of the SPR, J. Beloff, that my submissions could not be accepted by the SPR until a peer reviewed publication was offered.

When the publication in the proceedings of the Russian conference of 1991 was offered his response was, “We do not recognise the Russian Academy of Science”.

This had two important spin-offs:

Professor F.M. Kanarev proposed my alternative to relativity should be adopted for teaching throughout Russia.(5)

Dr Carr tells me:

“You are well known in cosmology circles, as a Maverick. No journal is ever going to publish any of your work.”

This gives the basic logic of what is now called the ‘Big Breed Theory’.(8)

This provides a paradox-free alternative to the big bang theory.

The whole community of cosmologists were taken completely by surprise, since, until then, they had all considered the expansion to be slowing down.(9)
They had no explanation but assumed some new kind of energy was involved and called it ‘Dark Energy’.
This had mysterious powers of anti-gravity repulsion at long range.

Five satellites are now in orbit looking for clues in the CMB to tell them what it is.
They say Dark Energy accounts for some 70% of all the energy in the universe.
What they are really looking at is the effect of the ultimate level of reality that is 100% of all that exists!

And the acceleration is the result of a tiny net creation going on everywhere all the time: it has nothing to do with anti-gravity forces.

But what is the use of their speculation when the problem of the cosmological constant, which still invalidates the big bang theory, remains unresolved as far as they are concerned?

And if the solution made available from Russian 1994 proceedings(5) and from the peer reviewed publications of 1997(6) and 2005(8), were read it would be realised that the search of the CMB tells them nothing.

Huge public funds are being wasted!